Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 评测：速度更快，配备 Wi
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
MacBook Air 13 厚度为 11.3 毫米，依然非常纤薄，其占地面积比戴尔 XPS 13 或 ThinkPad Z13 要大得多，几乎与 Zenbook 14 OLED 等 14 英寸设备相当。它的重量为 1.237 千克，35 瓦电源（带 2 个 USB-C）重 184 克，包括 MagSafe 电缆。
尺寸比较
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023 Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPU Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry HP Dragonfly G4 Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 Core i7-1360P Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 Gen 2 DIN A4 ❌
MBA 13 M3（午夜）对 MBA 15 M3（星光）
MBA 13 M3（午夜）对 MBA 15 M3（星光）我们还添加了一些与较大型 MacBook Air 15 M3 的对比照片。 MacBook Air 15 M3的对比照片，让你更直观地了解它的尺寸。
连接性 - 现在支持两个外部显示器在连接选项方面，没有任何变化，除了电源的 MagSafe 连接外，它的左侧仍然有两个 USB-C 端口（4.0），这两个端口仍然只支持 Thunderbolt 3。右侧只有 3.5 毫米音频插孔，我们希望至少能再看到一个 USB 接口。
MacBook Air 13 M3 配有两个外接屏幕。但有一项功能是全新的，因为以前的 MacBook Air M2除了内置面板外，只能为一台外接显示器供电。M3 SoC 的硬件要求完全相同，因此仍然只能控制两台显示器，但如果合上屏幕盖，现在也可以使用两台外接显示器（1 台最高 6K/60Hz，1 台最高 5K/60Hz）。当然，这仍然不是完全理想，但这显然是朝着正确方向迈出的一步，如果你想使用两台显示器，这将会带来很大的不同。
我们用两个外接显示器（一个通过 USB-C，另一个通过 USB-C/HDMI 适配器）测试了新功能，效果非常好。屏幕 MacBook Pro 14 M3也将在晚些时候通过软件更新获得这一功能。
左：MagSafe、2 个 USB-C 4.0 和 Thunderbolt 3（40 Gbit/s、DisplayPort ALT 模式、Power Delivery）
右：3.5 毫米音频交流Apple 新款 MacBook Air M3 更新了 WLAN 模块，现在可支持频率为 160 MHz 的 Wi-Fi 6E 和蓝牙 5.3。结合我们的华硕参考路由器，你可以立即看到效果，新款 MacBook Air M3 的速度是前代产品的两倍。 的两倍与较大的 MacBook Pro 机型一样快。
NetworkingApple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPUBroadcom 0x14E4, 0x4388 WiFi 6E AirPort iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1705 (min: 1668) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1719 (min: 1649) MBit/s ∼100%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MAIntel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1638 (min: 1574) MBit/s ∼96%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1654 (min: 1582) MBit/s ∼96%
Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 Gen 2MediaTek Wi-Fi 6E MT7922 160MHz Wireless LAN Card iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1526 (min: 1151) MBit/s ∼90%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1393 (min: 1081) MBit/s ∼81%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1224 (min: 903) MBit/s ∼90%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1365 (min: 977) MBit/s ∼81%
HP Dragonfly G4Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 iperf3 transmit AXE11000
973 (min: 879) MBit/s ∼57%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1200 (min: 1059) MBit/s ∼70%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1243 (min: 776) MBit/s ∼92%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1234 (min: 1042) MBit/s ∼73%
Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 Core i7-1360PIntel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 iperf3 transmit AXE11000
1118 (min: 1064) MBit/s ∼66%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
1266 (min: 928) MBit/s ∼74%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1094 (min: 570) MBit/s ∼81%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1173 (min: 982) MBit/s ∼70%
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023Intel Wi-Fi 6E AX211 iperf3 transmit AXE11000
591 (min: 549) MBit/s ∼35%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
938 (min: 925) MBit/s ∼55%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1353 (min: 1192) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1682 (min: 868) MBit/s ∼100%
Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax iperf3 transmit AXE11000
865 (min: 856) MBit/s ∼51%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
945 (min: 924) MBit/s ∼55%
Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPU Broadcom 0x14E4, 0x4388 WiFi 6E AirPort; iperf3 transmit AXE11000: Ø1705 (1668-1728) Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax; iperf3 transmit AXE11000: Ø865 (856-874) Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPU Broadcom 0x14E4, 0x4388 WiFi 6E AirPort; iperf3 receive AXE11000: Ø1719 (1649-1767) Apple MacBook Air M2 Entry 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax; iperf3 receive AXE11000: Ø945 (924-968)
网络摄像头它的 1080p 网络摄像头在光线条件良好的情况下仍能拍摄出不错的照片，我们对它的麦克风也毫无怨言。你还可以选择将 iPhone 用作网络摄像头。
14.6 ∆E9.1 ∆E15.9 ∆E20.7 ∆E15.1 ∆E10.9 ∆E6.5 ∆E9.7 ∆E8.8 ∆E9.9 ∆E9.9 ∆E5.6 ∆E5.2 ∆E14.4 ∆E12.1 ∆E6 ∆E9.5 ∆E15.1 ∆E4.1 ∆E6.3 ∆E14.2 ∆E18.3 ∆E17.3 ∆E2.9 ∆EColorChecker Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPU: 10.92 ∆E min: 2.94 - max: 20.67 ∆E
Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPU
维护只要有一把合适的五角螺丝刀，底盖就可以拆卸下来。不过，由于没有风扇，而且所有元件都是焊接上去的，所以您可以省去这些麻烦。必要时可以更换粘在一起的电池，但只能由合格的维修人员进行。
内部建设
底盖输入设备 - 超强触控板在输入设备方面，与 MacBook Air M2 相比没有任何变化。键盘的质量并没有达到商务笔记本电脑的标准，但总的来说，它很精确，在上面打字感觉很舒适。它的 Touch-ID 指纹扫描仪运行完美，而在白色键盘背光方面，Apple 多年来一直处于领先地位，因为它可以根据周围环境光线非常精确地自动调节强度。
输入设备
键盘背光它的超大触控板仍然是移动设备中的佼佼者，与 macOS 的集成也完美无瑕。由于采用了 Force Touch 技术，整个触控板上的点击都很均匀，声音也不大。此外，手势输入也非常完美。一如既往，MacBook Air 并不配备触摸屏。
显示屏 - P3 覆盖的 IPS在室内，反光也可能会妨碍拍摄。Apple Air 继续采用 13.6 英寸 IPS 屏幕。其分辨率为 2,560 x 1,664 像素，略有偏差。额外的 64 个垂直像素用于凹槽旁边的区域。一如既往，它看起来并不是最好的，但也没有占用实际 16:10 面板的任何空间。
主观而言，该面板的画质依然令人印象深刻。此外，macOS 仍然没有显示缩放问题。不过，由于该机型采用的仍是 60 赫兹面板，我们希望它能升级到 120 赫兹。它的响应时间不算特别快，但也不明显偏慢--在日常使用中，你不会注意到任何重影现象。它不使用 PWM，屏幕亮度和色温会根据环境光线自动调整。
子像素阵列
全亮度时可见背光出血我们在屏幕中间测得的最大亮度为 525 cd/m²，平均亮度略高于 500 cd/m²。遗憾的是，显示屏的黑色值 0.42 cd/m² 偏高，导致与 OLED 或 Mini-LED 面板相比，暗色内容看起来并非全黑。这也体现在屏幕的对比度上，"只有"~1,300:1。我们注意到，在高亮度水平下描绘暗色图像时，边角会出现一些背光出血现象。
492cd/m²483cd/m²500cd/m²510cd/m²525cd/m²513cd/m²504cd/m²524cd/m²505cd/m²
Distribution of brightnesstested with X-Rite i1Pro 2Maximum: 525 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 506.2 cd/m² Minimum: 1.9 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 92 %Center on Battery: 525 cd/m²Contrast: 1250:1 (Black: 0.42 cd/m²)ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 1.4 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.78}ΔE Greyscale Calman: 2 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5}87.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 3D)99.9% sRGB (Argyll 3D)98.4% Display P3 (Argyll 3D)Gamma: 2.2CCT: 6876 KDownload ICC File (X-Rite i1Pro 2)
Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPUIPS, 2560x1664, 13.6"Apple MacBook Air M2 EntryIPS, 2560x1664, 13.6"Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MAATNA40CU06-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 14"Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 Gen 2ATNA33AA02-0, OLED, 2880x1800, 13.3"HP Dragonfly G4Chi Mei CMN13C0, IPS, 1920x1280, 13.5"Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 Core i7-1360PSamsung 134XK04, OLED, 3456x2160, 13.4"Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023TMX1422, IPS, 3120x2080, 14.2"Display0%4%4%-17%4%-5% Display P3 Coverage (%)98.498.4 0%99.8 1%99.7 1%68.4 -30%99.7 1%89.8 -9% sRGB Coverage (%)99.999.9 0%100 0%100 0%98.3 -2%100 0%99.4 -1% AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage (%)87.987.6 0%97.6 11%97.3 11%70.4 -20%96.8 10%84.2 -4%Response Times7%98%93%-28%93%58% Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * (ms)34.5 ?(16.9, 17.6)32.9 ?(17.8, 15.1) 5%0.69 ?(0.37, 0.32) 98%2.1 ?(1.1, 1) 94%48.8 ?(22.9, 25.9) -41%2.18 ?(1.2, 0.98) 94%20 ?(6, 14) 42% Response Time Black / White * (ms)27.2 ?(15.5, 11.7)24.9 ?(10.4, 14.5) 8%0.71 ?(0.38, 0.33) 97%2.2 ?(1, 1.2) 92%31.3 ?(16.3, 15) -15%2.08 ?(0.98, 1.1) 92%7 ?(2, 5) 74% PWM Frequency (Hz)480 ?(80)60.1 ?(100)238.6 ?(100)156000 ?(50)Screen3%198%3%-14%-87%-10%Brightness middle (cd/m²)525526 0%391 -26%372 -29%408.8 -22%361.7 -31%595 13%Brightness (cd/m²)506486 -4%392 -23%375 -26%399 -21%367 -27%550 9%Brightness Distribution (%)9287 -5%98 7%99 8%90 -2%96 4%85 -8%Black Level * (cd/m²)0.420.38 10%0.02 95%0.32 24%0.25 40%Contrast (:1)12501384 11%19550 1464%1278 2%2380 90%Colorchecker dE 2000 *1.41.3 7%1.1 21%0.88 37%2.02 -44%4.83 -245%2.01 -44%Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *2.82.7 4%2.4 14%3.22 -15%3.84 -37%9.34 -234%6.9 -146%Greyscale dE 2000 *22 -0%1.3 35%1.2 40%2.3 -15%1.8 10%2.74 -37%Gamma2.2 100%2.25 98%2.17 101%2.18 101%2.2 100%2.33 94%2.4 92%CCT6876 95%6858 95%6336 103%6326 103%6203 105%6438 101%6319 103%Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *0.70.613.971.22Total Average (Program / Settings)3% /
3%100% /
138%33% /
19%-20% /
-17%3% /
-30%14% /
1%* ... smaller is better
卡尔曼灰度
CalMAN 饱和度
CalMAN 色彩检查器
CalMAN 灰度校准
CalMAN 饱和度校准
CalMAN ColorChecker 已校准不过，我们使用专业 CalMAN 软件（X-Rite i1 Pro 2）进行分析后发现，该面板的色调略微偏蓝，色温也略微偏低。使用我们自己的校准软件（可在上面免费下载相应的配置文件），我们成功地控制了这两个问题，进一步降低了总偏差。反过来，其最大亮度也降低了约 25 cd/m²。完全覆盖 P3 色彩空间。
对比 sRGB
对 P3
对比 AdobeRGB
Display Response TimesℹDisplay response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times. ↔ Response Time Black to White27.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 15.5 ms rise↘ 11.7 ms fallThe screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 68 % of all devices are better.This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.2 ms). ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey34.5 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 16.9 ms rise↘ 17.6 ms fallThe screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 47 % of all devices are better.This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (31.7 ms).
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)ℹTo dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.Screen flickering / PWM not detectedIn comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8142 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.
室外（阴天）
在阳光下
虽然 Macbook Air 的显示屏一般都很光亮，但它不像大多数采用 OLED 面板或触摸屏的 Windows 笔记本电脑那样反光。因此，只要避免阳光直射，你仍然可以在明亮的环境中工作。它的视角稳定性非常好。
视角稳定性性能 - 3 纳米 M3 SoCMacBook Air 13 有两种不同的 M3 SoC 可供选择。配备 8 个内核的 CPU 部分完全相同，而基本型号则继续配备 8 个 GPU 内核，并可选择配备速度更快的 10 核 GPU，这在 MacBook Pro 14 M3.你可以选择 8、16 或 24 GB 内存。顺便说一句，电源的选择不会对设备的性能产生任何影响。
处理器 -Apple M3，3 纳米制程Apple M3 SoC（来源： )AppleM3 SoC Apple M3 SoC是Apple 首款采用 3 纳米工艺制造的芯片。其核心配置与旧版 M2 SoC但得益于制造工艺的改进，Apple 在不增加能耗的情况下提高了时钟频率。现在，它的四个性能内核最高主频可达 4.056 GHz（或所有内核加载时约为 3.6 GHz），四个效率内核最高主频可达 2.748 GHz。在多核测试中，该处理器的功耗曾一度达到约 21 瓦，之后稳步下降，在 12 分钟的连续负载中达到 10.5 瓦（R23 Multi：8237 点，因此降低约 19%）。总体而言，它在短时间测试中的表现与 MacBook Pro 14 M3的性能保持稳定，这要归功于其主动散热系统。
与旧版 M2 SoC 相比，其性能平均提高了约 20%。这意味着 M3 SoC 的性能略低于 Ryzen 7 7840U或 酷睿至尊 7 155H的水平。 ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12不过，这两种机型的能耗也更高。
在单核测试中，Apple 的性能比 M2 提高了 20%，在 AMD 和英特尔的竞争中拔得头筹。这些成绩令人印象深刻，尤其是考虑到其单核能耗仅为 5 瓦多。我们已经在的分析文章中介绍了新款 M3 SoC 的效率。 在电池使用情况下，MacBook Air 13 M3 的 CPU 性能保持不变。更多 CPU 基准测试请访问。
Cinebench 2024: CPU Multi Core | CPU Single Core Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core Geekbench 6.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core Cinebench 2024 / CPU Multi Core
Apple M3 Pro 12-CoreMacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Pro
1059 Points +84%Apple M3 Pro 11-CoreMacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Pro
908 Points +58%Apple M3MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3
712 Points +24%Intel Core Ultra 7 155HThinkPad X1 Carbon G12
698 Points +21%Average of class Subnotebook (148 - 1162, n=72, last 2 years)
676 Points +17%Average Apple M3 (576 - 712, n=4)
622 Points +8%AMD Ryzen 7 7840UThinkPad T14s G4-21F8002TGE
609 Points +6%Apple M3MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPU
576 Points Cinebench 2024 / CPU Single Core
Apple M3 Pro 11-CoreMacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Pro
144 Points +2%Apple M3 Pro 12-CoreMacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Pro
143 Points +1%Apple M3MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPU
141 Points Average Apple M3 (140 - 142, n=4)
141 Points 0%Apple M3MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3
140 Points -1%Average of class Subnotebook (35 - 173, n=55, last 2 years)
113.6 Points -19%AMD Ryzen 7 7840UThinkPad T14s G4-21F8002TGE
97 Points -31%Cinebench R23 / Multi Core
Apple M3 Pro 12-CoreMacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Pro
15106 Points +50%Apple M2 ProMacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro
14787 Points +47%Intel Core Ultra 7 155HThinkPad X1 Carbon G12
14583 (10835.5min - 14582.8max) Points +45%AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840UThinkPad Z13 Gen 2
13767 (13362.4min - 13766.9max) Points +37%Apple M3 Pro 11-CoreMacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Pro
13315 Points +32%Intel Core Ultra 7 155HZenBook 14 UX3405MA
12794 Points +27%Average of class Subnotebook (1555 - 21812, n=78, last 2 years)
12166 Points +21%Apple M2 Pro 10-CoreMacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Entry
11811 Points +17%AMD Ryzen 7 7840UThinkPad T14s G4-21F8002TGE
11797 Points +17%Intel Core i7-1360PMateBook X Pro 2023
11571 Points +15%Intel Core i7-1360PXPS 13 Plus 9320 Core i7-1360P
11503 (9427.43min - 11502.9max) Points +14%Apple M3MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3
10454 Points +4%Average Apple M3 (10074 - 10454, n=3)
10275 Points +2%Apple M3MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPU
10074 Points Apple M2MacBook Air M2 10C GPU
8517 Points -15%Intel Core i7-1365UDragonfly G4
7532 (5307.67min - 7531.78max) Points -25%Cinebench R23 / Single Core
Apple M3 Pro 12-CoreMacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Pro
1977 Points +4%Apple M3 Pro 11-CoreMacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Pro
1942 Points +2%Apple M3MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3
1904 Points 0%Average Apple M3 (1900 - 1904, n=3)
1901 Points 0%Apple M3MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPU
1900 Points Intel Core i7-1365UDragonfly G4
1891 Points 0%Intel Core i7-1360PMateBook X Pro 2023
1848 Points -3%Intel Core i7-1360PXPS 13 Plus 9320 Core i7-1360P
1848 Points -3%Intel Core Ultra 7 155HZenBook 14 UX3405MA
1772 Points -7%AMD Ryzen 7 7840UThinkPad T14s G4-21F8002TGE
1742 Points -8%Intel Core Ultra 7 155HThinkPad X1 Carbon G12
1730 Points -9%Average of class Subnotebook (358 - 2165, n=79, last 2 years)
1711 Points -10%AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840UThinkPad Z13 Gen 2
1703 Points -10%Apple M2 ProMacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro
1647 Points -13%Apple M2 Pro 10-CoreMacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Entry
1643 Points -14%Apple M2MacBook Air M2 10C GPU
1580 Points -17%Geekbench 6.5 / Multi-Core
Apple M3 Pro 12-CoreMacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Pro
15480 Points +29%Apple M3 Pro 11-CoreMacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Pro
14412 Points +20%Intel Core Ultra 7 155HZenBook 14 UX3405MA
12971 Points +8%Intel Core Ultra 7 155HThinkPad X1 Carbon G12
12171 Points +1%AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840UThinkPad Z13 Gen 2
12069 Points 0%Apple M3MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPU
12034 Points Average of class Subnotebook (2244 - 17489, n=83, last 2 years)
11967 Points -1%Apple M3MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3
11966 Points -1%Average Apple M3 (11752 - 12066, n=7)
11921 Points -1%AMD Ryzen 7 7840UThinkPad T14s G4-21F8002TGE
10893 Points -9%Geekbench 6.5 / Single-Core
Apple M3 Pro 12-CoreMacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Pro
3138 Points +4%Apple M3 Pro 11-CoreMacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Pro
3113 Points +3%Apple M3MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3
3099 Points +2%Average Apple M3 (2994 - 3130, n=7)
3057 Points +1%Apple M3MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPU
3026 Points Average of class Subnotebook (960 - 3820, n=77, last 2 years)
2615 Points -14%AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840UThinkPad Z13 Gen 2
2479 Points -18%Intel Core Ultra 7 155HZenBook 14 UX3405MA
2454 Points -19%Intel Core Ultra 7 155HThinkPad X1 Carbon G12
2420 Points -20%AMD Ryzen 7 7840UThinkPad T14s G4-21F8002TGE
2399 Points -21%Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
Apple M3 Pro 12-CoreMacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Pro
15298 Points +42%Apple M2 ProMacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro
14859 Points +38%Apple M3 Pro 11-CoreMacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Pro
13312 Points +24%Intel Core Ultra 7 155HZenBook 14 UX3405MA
12469 Points +16%Apple M2 Pro 10-CoreMacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Entry
12189 Points +13%Intel Core Ultra 7 155HThinkPad X1 Carbon G12
11567 Points +8%AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840UThinkPad Z13 Gen 2
10920 Points +2%Intel Core i7-1360PXPS 13 Plus 9320 Core i7-1360P
10817 Points +1%Apple M3MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3
10774 Points 0%Apple M3MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPU
10748 Points Average of class Subnotebook (2557 - 17218, n=67, last 2 years)
10619 Points -1%Average Apple M3 (10402 - 10774, n=5)
10603 Points -1%AMD Ryzen 7 7840UThinkPad T14s G4-21F8002TGE
9644 Points -10%Apple M2MacBook Air M2 10C GPU
8991 Points -16%Intel Core i7-1360PMateBook X Pro 2023
8909 Points -17%Intel Core i7-1365UDragonfly G4
8778 Points -18%Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
Apple M3MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3
2342 Points +4%Apple M3 Pro 11-CoreMacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 Pro
2331 Points +3%Apple M3 Pro 12-CoreMacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Pro
2327 Points +3%Apple M3MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPU
2256 Points Average Apple M3 (1286 - 2350, n=5)
2092 Points -7%Apple M2 ProMacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro
1961 Points -13%Apple M2 Pro 10-CoreMacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro Entry
1926 Points -15%Apple M2MacBook Air M2 10C GPU
1925 Points -15%Intel Core i7-1365UDragonfly G4
1902 Points -16%Average of class Subnotebook (726 - 2350, n=67, last 2 years)
1872 Points -17%AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840UThinkPad Z13 Gen 2
1853 Points -18%Intel Core i7-1360PXPS 13 Plus 9320 Core i7-1360P
1825 Points -19%Intel Core Ultra 7 155HZenBook 14 UX3405MA
1805 Points -20%Intel Core i7-1360PMateBook X Pro 2023
1792 Points -21%AMD Ryzen 7 7840UThinkPad T14s G4-21F8002TGE
1775 Points -21%Intel Core Ultra 7 155HThinkPad X1 Carbon G12
1768 Points -22%Cinebench 2024: CPU Multi Core | CPU Single Core Cinebench R23: Multi Core | Single Core Geekbench 6.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core Geekbench 5.5: Multi-Core | Single-Core
系统性能非晶态内存标记旧款 MacBook Air M2在日常使用中已经是一款超快的设备，新的 M3 SoC 也是如此。特别是在运行本地应用程序时，它的性能非常出色，在合成基准测试中，新款 MacBook Air 13 M3 几乎总是领先于 Windows 系统的竞争对手。
基于英特尔处理器的 Mac 应用程序可以通过 Rosetta 2 进行模拟，效果非常好。速度上可能会有些许差异（尤其是在复杂的应用程序中），但总的来说，运行绝对良好。目前，围绕人工智能的话题已是大势所趋，Apple ，自M1 芯片发布以来，它也已安装了神经引擎形式的 NPU 。例如，它可用于在撰写信息时预测单词。如果您喜欢使用包括 Co-Pilot 在内的微软办公套件，那么您不必担心，因为这项功能是通过云提供的，这意味着与 Windows 设备没有任何区别。
CrossMark: Overall | Productivity | Creativity | Responsiveness WebXPRT 3: Overall WebXPRT 4: Overall Mozilla Kraken 1.1: Total Jetstream 2: 2.0 Total Score CrossMark / Overall
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P
1876 Points +2%Average Apple M3, Apple M3 10-Core GPU (1847 - 1857, n=3)
1850 Points 0%Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3M3 10-Core GPU, M3, Apple SSD AP1024Z
1847 Points 0%Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPUM3 10-Core GPU, M3, Apple SSD AP0512Z
1847 Points Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 Core i7-1360PIris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
1773 Points -4%HP Dragonfly G4Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1365U, Micron 3400 MTFDKBA512TFH 512GB
1628 Points -12%Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MAArc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
1605 Points -13%Average of class Subnotebook (365 - 2038, n=71, last 2 years)
1605 Points -13%Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 Gen 2Radeon 780M, R7 PRO 7840U, SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N
1533 Points -17%Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPUM2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024Z
1496 Points -19%CrossMark / Productivity
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P
1829 Points +7%Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3M3 10-Core GPU, M3, Apple SSD AP1024Z
1729 Points +1%Average Apple M3, Apple M3 10-Core GPU (1716 - 1729, n=3)
1724 Points 0%Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPUM3 10-Core GPU, M3, Apple SSD AP0512Z
1716 Points Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 Core i7-1360PIris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
1661 Points -3%HP Dragonfly G4Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1365U, Micron 3400 MTFDKBA512TFH 512GB
1620 Points -6%Average of class Subnotebook (364 - 1918, n=71, last 2 years)
1534 Points -11%Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MAArc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
1523 Points -11%Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 Gen 2Radeon 780M, R7 PRO 7840U, SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N
1461 Points -15%Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPUM2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024Z
1377 Points -20%CrossMark / Creativity
Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPUM3 10-Core GPU, M3, Apple SSD AP0512Z
2199 Points Average Apple M3, Apple M3 10-Core GPU (2183 - 2210, n=3)
2197 Points 0%Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3M3 10-Core GPU, M3, Apple SSD AP1024Z
2183 Points -1%Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 Core i7-1360PIris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
2003 Points -9%Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P
1917 Points -13%Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MAArc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
1863 Points -15%Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 Gen 2Radeon 780M, R7 PRO 7840U, SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N
1824 Points -17%Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPUM2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024Z
1819 Points -17%Average of class Subnotebook (372 - 2396, n=71, last 2 years)
1793 Points -18%HP Dragonfly G4Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1365U, Micron 3400 MTFDKBA512TFH 512GB
1731 Points -21%CrossMark / Responsiveness
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P
1899 Points +39%Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 Core i7-1360PIris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
1493 Points +9%HP Dragonfly G4Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1365U, Micron 3400 MTFDKBA512TFH 512GB
1373 Points +1%Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3M3 10-Core GPU, M3, Apple SSD AP1024Z
1367 Points 0%Average Apple M3, Apple M3 10-Core GPU (1364 - 1367, n=3)
1366 Points 0%Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPUM3 10-Core GPU, M3, Apple SSD AP0512Z
1364 Points Average of class Subnotebook (312 - 1889, n=71, last 2 years)
1332 Points -2%Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MAArc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
1201 Points -12%Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPUM2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024Z
1065 Points -22%Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 Gen 2Radeon 780M, R7 PRO 7840U, SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N
1049 Points -23%WebXPRT 3 / Overall
Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPUM3 10-Core GPU, M3, Apple SSD AP0512Z
445 Points Average Apple M3, Apple M3 10-Core GPU (423 - 448, n=3)
439 Points -1%Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3M3 10-Core GPU, M3, Apple SSD AP1024Z
423 Points -5%Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPUM2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024Z
375 Points -16%Average of class Subnotebook (156 - 482, n=69, last 2 years)
317 Points -29%Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 Core i7-1360PIris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
313 Points -30%HP Dragonfly G4Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1365U, Micron 3400 MTFDKBA512TFH 512GB
305 Points -31%Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 Gen 2Radeon 780M, R7 PRO 7840U, SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N
298 Points -33%Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MAArc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
255 Points -43%WebXPRT 4 / Overall
Average Apple M3, Apple M3 10-Core GPU (313 - 315, n=2)
314 Points 0%Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPUM3 10-Core GPU, M3, Apple SSD AP0512Z
313 Points Average of class Subnotebook (132 - 348, n=71, last 2 years)
268 Points -14%Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 Core i7-1360PIris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
267 Points -15%HP Dragonfly G4Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1365U, Micron 3400 MTFDKBA512TFH 512GB
266 Points -15%Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MAArc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
243.5 Points -22%Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P
234 Points -25%Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 Gen 2Radeon 780M, R7 PRO 7840U, SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N
234 Points -25%Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPUM2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024Z
225 Points -28%Mozilla Kraken 1.1 / Total
Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P
612 ms * -64%Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 Gen 2Radeon 780M, R7 PRO 7840U, SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N
569 ms * -52%Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MAArc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
521 ms * -40%Average of class Subnotebook (265 - 1104, n=75, last 2 years)
498 ms * -33%Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 Core i7-1360PIris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
497 ms * -33%HP Dragonfly G4Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1365U, Micron 3400 MTFDKBA512TFH 512GB
494 ms * -32%Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPUM2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024Z
460.9 ms * -23%Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPUM3 10-Core GPU, M3, Apple SSD AP0512Z
373.2 ms * Average Apple M3, Apple M3 10-Core GPU (363 - 373, n=3)
366 ms * +2%Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3M3 10-Core GPU, M3, Apple SSD AP1024Z
362.8 ms * +3%Jetstream 2 / 2.0 Total Score
Average of class Subnotebook (117 - 441, n=40, last 2 years)
329 Points +4%Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPUM3 10-Core GPU, M3, Apple SSD AP0512Z
316.8 Points Average Apple M3, Apple M3 10-Core GPU (305 - 318, n=3)
313 Points -1%Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MAArc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM
305.1 Points -4%Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3M3 10-Core GPU, M3, Apple SSD AP1024Z
304.5 Points -4%Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 Core i7-1360PIris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ
280.053 Points -12%HP Dragonfly G4Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1365U, Micron 3400 MTFDKBA512TFH 512GB
274.449 Points -13%Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPUM2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024Z
226.8 Points -28%* ... smaller is better
存储设备非晶磁盘标记正如 MacBook Pro 14 M3Apple ，MacBook Air 13 M3 继续只配备 PCIe-3.0 固态硬盘。我们的测试设备安装的是 512GB 版本（AP0512Z），其传输速率符合预期，即 ~3.5 GB/s。因此，在日常使用中不会遇到任何限制。我们预计 256GB 型号的性能会更低（约为 50%），我们将尽快进行检查。首次启动设备后，用户有 465 GB 的可用空间。Air M3 最多可安装 2 TB 的固态硬盘。更多固态硬盘基准测试 这里。
Drive Performance rating | Blackmagic Disk Speed Test Drive Performance rating - Percent
Average Apple SSD AP0512Z
100 pt Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPUApple SSD AP0512Z
89.3 pt Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3Apple SSD AP1024Z
85.3 pt Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPUApple SSD AP1024Z
84.5 pt Average of class Subnotebook
83.9 pt Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GBApple SSD AP1024Z
83.2 pt Apple MacBook Air M2 EntryApple SSD AP0256Z
45.5 pt Blackmagic Disk Speed Test
5GB ReadAverage Apple SSD AP0512Z (2896 - 4756, n=8)
3373 MB/s +16%Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPUApple SSD AP0512Z
2905.7 MB/s Average of class Subnotebook (2833 - 2948, n=4, last 2 years)
2898 MB/s 0%Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3Apple SSD AP1024Z
2876.6 MB/s -1%Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GBApple SSD AP1024Z
2847.5 MB/s -2%Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPUApple SSD AP1024Z
2796.5 MB/s -4%Apple MacBook Air M2 EntryApple SSD AP0256Z
1475.8 MB/s -49% 5GB WriteAverage Apple SSD AP0512Z (3123 - 4199, n=8)
3505 MB/s +8%Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPUApple SSD AP0512Z
3242.6 MB/s Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPUApple SSD AP1024Z
3017.3 MB/s -7%Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3Apple SSD AP1024Z
2992.9 MB/s -8%Apple MacBook Air 15 2023 M2 16 GBApple SSD AP1024Z
2873.2 MB/s -11%Average of class Subnotebook (1988 - 3243, n=4, last 2 years)
2868 MB/s -12%Apple MacBook Air M2 EntryApple SSD AP0256Z
1652.8 MB/s -49%
图形卡野生动物极限压力测试我们的测试样品安装了 10 核的 M3 GPU，我们已经从 MacBook Pro 14 M3 上了解到这一点。它的最大功耗约为 15 瓦，总的来说，其性能与 MacBook Pro 处于同一水平，尽管 Air 在长期负载情况下也会减速。在 3DMark WildLife-Extreme 压力测试中，运行 20 次后，Air 的成绩下降了约 25%。其 GPU 性能也比拥有 10 个内核的旧款 M2 GPU 高出 20%。在电池使用情况下，它的图形性能保持不变，更多基准测试可参见 这里.
MacBook 上的游戏速度正在慢慢加快，《全面战争：法老王》或《博德之门 3》等游戏都能在 MacBook 上原生运行。不过，《博德之门 3》对高细节的要求太高，所以你必须激活 FSR，才能在 1080p/High 下达到约 35fps。说到 FSR，你至少应该选择设置质量，因为如果不这样做，笔记本的图形性能就会大打折扣。古墓丽影》或 Witcher 3 等模拟游戏也可以在 MacBook 上运行，但根据游戏的不同，可能会有一些限制，其性能也会受到一些限制。
3DMark | GFXBench | Geekbench 5.5 | Geekbench 6.5 3DMark - Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 ProApple M3 Pro 18-Core GPU, Apple M3 Pro 12-Core
14545 Points +77%Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 ProApple M2 Pro 19-Core GPU, Apple M2 Pro
12968 Points +57%Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 ProApple M3 Pro 14-Core GPU, Apple M3 Pro 11-Core
12094 Points +47%Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro EntryApple M2 Pro 16-Core GPU, Apple M2 Pro 10-Core
11224 Points +36%Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3Apple M3 10-Core GPU, Apple M3
8302 Points +1%Average Apple M3 10-Core GPU (8239 - 8302, n=3)
8276 Points 0%Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPUApple M3 10-Core GPU, Apple M3
8239 Points Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPUApple M2 10-Core GPU, Apple M2
6824 Points -17%Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MAIntel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
6558 Points -20%Average of class Subnotebook (3225 - 9092, n=28, last 2 years)
6399 Points -22%Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4-21F8002TGEAMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
4332 Points -47%GFXBench
3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier OffscreenApple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 ProApple M3 Pro 18-Core GPU, Apple M3 Pro 12-Core
97.8 fps +89%Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 ProApple M2 Pro 19-Core GPU, Apple M2 Pro
92.1 fps +78%Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 ProApple M3 Pro 14-Core GPU, Apple M3 Pro 11-Core
79 fps +53%Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro EntryApple M2 Pro 16-Core GPU, Apple M2 Pro 10-Core
78.7 fps +52%Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3Apple M3 10-Core GPU, Apple M3
52.3 fps +1%Average Apple M3 10-Core GPU (51.8 - 52.6, n=3)
52.2 fps +1%Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPUApple M3 10-Core GPU, Apple M3
51.8 fps Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPUApple M2 10-Core GPU, Apple M2
48.6 fps -6%Average of class Subnotebook (16.3 - 88.9, n=19, last 2 years)
39.3 fps -24%2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier OffscreenApple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 ProApple M3 Pro 18-Core GPU, Apple M3 Pro 12-Core
219.7 fps +92%Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 ProApple M2 Pro 19-Core GPU, Apple M2 Pro
210.4 fps +84%Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro EntryApple M2 Pro 16-Core GPU, Apple M2 Pro 10-Core
181.1 fps +58%Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 ProApple M3 Pro 14-Core GPU, Apple M3 Pro 11-Core
178.7 fps +56%Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3Apple M3 10-Core GPU, Apple M3
121 fps +6%Average Apple M3 10-Core GPU (114.4 - 121, n=3)
118.5 fps +4%Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPUApple M3 10-Core GPU, Apple M3
114.4 fps Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPUApple M2 10-Core GPU, Apple M2
110 fps -4%Average of class Subnotebook (37.4 - 123.3, n=18, last 2 years)
80.7 fps -29%1920x1080 Car Chase OffscreenApple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 ProApple M3 Pro 18-Core GPU, Apple M3 Pro 12-Core
436 fps +68%Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 ProApple M2 Pro 19-Core GPU, Apple M2 Pro
434.4 fps +68%Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro EntryApple M2 Pro 16-Core GPU, Apple M2 Pro 10-Core
389 fps +50%Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 ProApple M3 Pro 14-Core GPU, Apple M3 Pro 11-Core
376.3 fps +45%Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3Apple M3 10-Core GPU, Apple M3
268.6 fps +4%Average Apple M3 10-Core GPU (259 - 269, n=3)
263 fps +2%Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPUApple M3 10-Core GPU, Apple M3
259 fps Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPUApple M2 10-Core GPU, Apple M2
226 fps -13%Average of class Subnotebook (107.4 - 260, n=12, last 2 years)
184.4 fps -29%Geekbench 5.5
Metal ScoreApple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 ProApple M3 Pro 18-Core GPU, Apple M3 Pro 12-Core
55240 Points +60%Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 ProApple M2 Pro 19-Core GPU, Apple M2 Pro
52054 Points +50%Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro EntryApple M2 Pro 16-Core GPU, Apple M2 Pro 10-Core
46834 Points +35%Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 ProApple M3 Pro 14-Core GPU, Apple M3 Pro 11-Core
46145 Points +33%Average of class Subnotebook (34603 - 34823, n=2, last 2 years)
34713 Points 0%Average Apple M3 10-Core GPU (34398 - 34823, n=3)
34608 Points 0%Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPUApple M3 10-Core GPU, Apple M3
34603 Points Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3Apple M3 10-Core GPU, Apple M3
34398 Points -1%Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPUApple M2 10-Core GPU, Apple M2
30269 Points -13% OpenCL ScoreApple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 ProApple M3 Pro 18-Core GPU, Apple M3 Pro 12-Core
52441 Points +66%Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 ProApple M2 Pro 19-Core GPU, Apple M2 Pro
46941 Points +48%Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 ProApple M3 Pro 14-Core GPU, Apple M3 Pro 11-Core
45348 Points +43%Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro EntryApple M2 Pro 16-Core GPU, Apple M2 Pro 10-Core
42483 Points +34%Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 Gen 2AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U
34349 Points +9%Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4-21F8002TGEAMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
34161 Points +8%Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3Apple M3 10-Core GPU, Apple M3
32540 Points +3%Average Apple M3 10-Core GPU (31647 - 32540, n=3)
32209 Points +2%Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPUApple M3 10-Core GPU, Apple M3
31647 Points Average of class Subnotebook (11490 - 58402, n=65, last 2 years)
30979 Points -2%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
30817 Points -3%Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MAIntel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
30010 Points -5%Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPUApple M2 10-Core GPU, Apple M2
27489 Points -13%Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 Core i7-1360PIntel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1360P
21110 Points -33%Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1360P
20881 Points -34%HP Dragonfly G4Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1365U
18313 Points -42%Geekbench 6.5
GPU MetalApple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 ProApple M3 Pro 18-Core GPU, Apple M3 Pro 12-Core
78324 Points +64%Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 ProApple M3 Pro 14-Core GPU, Apple M3 Pro 11-Core
68043 Points +43%Average of class Subnotebook (47686 - 54887, n=4, last 2 years)
49576 Points +4%Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPUApple M3 10-Core GPU, Apple M3
47686 Points Average Apple M3 10-Core GPU (47494 - 47699, n=3)
47626 Points 0%Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3Apple M3 10-Core GPU, Apple M3
47494 Points 0% GPU OpenCLApple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 ProApple M3 Pro 18-Core GPU, Apple M3 Pro 12-Core
50373 Points +65%Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 ProApple M3 Pro 14-Core GPU, Apple M3 Pro 11-Core
42798 Points +40%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
35267 Points +16%Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MAIntel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
32096 Points +5%Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPUApple M3 10-Core GPU, Apple M3
30506 Points Average Apple M3 10-Core GPU (30414 - 30506, n=3)
30463 Points 0%Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3Apple M3 10-Core GPU, Apple M3
30414 Points 0%Average of class Subnotebook (9487 - 206281, n=75, last 2 years)
30324 Points -1%Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 Gen 2AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U
29695 Points -3%Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4-21F8002TGEAMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
27190 Points -11%3DMark | GFXBench | Geekbench 5.5 | Geekbench 6.5
Blender: v3.3 Classroom METAL | v3.3 Classroom CPU Blender / v3.3 Classroom METAL
Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPUApple M3 10-Core GPU, Apple M3
134 Seconds * Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro EntryApple M2 Pro 16-Core GPU, Apple M2 Pro 10-Core
132 Seconds * +1%Average Apple M3 10-Core GPU (121 - 134, n=3)
128 Seconds * +4%Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3Apple M3 10-Core GPU, Apple M3
121 Seconds * +10%Average of class Subnotebook (103 - 134, n=4, last 2 years)
119 Seconds * +11%Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 ProApple M2 Pro 19-Core GPU, Apple M2 Pro
97 Seconds * +28%Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 ProApple M3 Pro 14-Core GPU, Apple M3 Pro 11-Core
73 Seconds * +46%Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 ProApple M3 Pro 18-Core GPU, Apple M3 Pro 12-Core
69 Seconds * +49%Blender / v3.3 Classroom CPU
HP Dragonfly G4Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1365U
796 Seconds * -54%Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3Apple M3 10-Core GPU, Apple M3
761 Seconds * -47%Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPUApple M2 10-Core GPU, Apple M2
645 Seconds * -25%Average Apple M3 10-Core GPU (491 - 761, n=3)
590 Seconds * -14%Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1360P
537 Seconds * -4%Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MAIntel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
535 Seconds * -3%Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 Core i7-1360PIntel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs, Intel Core i7-1360P
531 Seconds * -3%Average of class Subnotebook (241 - 861, n=73, last 2 years)
521 Seconds * -1%Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPUApple M3 10-Core GPU, Apple M3
517 Seconds * Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4-21F8002TGEAMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 7840U
448 Seconds * +13%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU, Intel Core Ultra 7 155H
437 Seconds * +15%Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro EntryApple M2 Pro 16-Core GPU, Apple M2 Pro 10-Core
435 Seconds * +16%Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 Gen 2AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U
385 Seconds * +26%Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 ProApple M3 Pro 14-Core GPU, Apple M3 Pro 11-Core
355 Seconds * +31%Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 ProApple M2 Pro 19-Core GPU, Apple M2 Pro
331 Seconds * +36%Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 ProApple M3 Pro 18-Core GPU, Apple M3 Pro 12-Core
314 Seconds * +39%Blender: v3.3 Classroom METAL | v3.3 Classroom CPU * ... smaller is better
The Witcher 3 | Total War Pharaoh | Baldur's Gate 3 | Shadow of the Tomb Raider The Witcher 3
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off)Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 ProApple M2 Pro, Apple M2 Pro 19-Core GPU
57 fps +58%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
51.7 (48min) fps +44%Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro EntryApple M2 Pro 10-Core, Apple M2 Pro 16-Core GPU
51 fps +42%Average of class Subnotebook (11.2 - 71, n=32, last 2 years)
47.3 fps +31%Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 Gen 2AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
45.8 (43min) fps +27%Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4-21F8002TGEAMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
43 fps +19%Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MAIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
40 fps +11%Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3Apple M3, Apple M3 10-Core GPU
38 fps +6%Average Apple M3 10-Core GPU (36 - 38, n=3)
36.7 fps +2%Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPUApple M3, Apple M3 10-Core GPU
36 fps Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
35.7 fps -1%Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 Core i7-1360PIntel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
33.9 (31min) fps -6%HP Dragonfly G4Intel Core i7-1365U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
31 (28min) fps -14%1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 ProApple M2 Pro, Apple M2 Pro 19-Core GPU
51 fps +113%Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro EntryApple M2 Pro 10-Core, Apple M2 Pro 16-Core GPU
45 fps +88%Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 ProApple M3 Pro 12-Core, Apple M3 Pro 18-Core GPU
43 fps +79%Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 ProApple M3 Pro 11-Core, Apple M3 Pro 14-Core GPU
39 fps +63%Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 Gen 2AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
28.6 (24min) fps +19%Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3Apple M3, Apple M3 10-Core GPU
28 fps +17%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
25.5 (23min) fps +6%Average Apple M3 10-Core GPU (24 - 28, n=3)
25.3 fps +5%Lenovo ThinkPad T14s G4-21F8002TGEAMD Ryzen 7 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
25.2 (23min, 24P1) fps +5%Average of class Subnotebook (8.5 - 43.7, n=34, last 2 years)
24.6 fps +3%Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPUApple M3, Apple M3 10-Core GPU
24 fps Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MAIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
19.2 (11min, 13P1) fps -20%Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
16.4 fps -32%Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 Core i7-1360PIntel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
15.4 (14min) fps -36%HP Dragonfly G4Intel Core i7-1365U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
14.7 (13min) fps -39%Total War Pharaoh
1920x1080 High PresetApple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 ProApple M3 Pro 12-Core, Apple M3 Pro 18-Core GPU
77 fps +79%Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 ProApple M3 Pro 11-Core, Apple M3 Pro 14-Core GPU
67 fps +56%Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3Apple M3, Apple M3 10-Core GPU
45 fps +5%Average Apple M3 10-Core GPU (43 - 45, n=3)
44 fps +2%Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPUApple M3, Apple M3 10-Core GPU
43 fps Average of class Subnotebook (16.2 - 59, n=11, last 2 years)
40.1 fps -7%1920x1080 Ultra PresetApple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 ProApple M3 Pro 12-Core, Apple M3 Pro 18-Core GPU
58 fps +107%Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 ProApple M3 Pro 11-Core, Apple M3 Pro 14-Core GPU
53 fps +89%Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3Apple M3, Apple M3 10-Core GPU
36 fps +29%Average Apple M3 10-Core GPU (28 - 36, n=3)
33 fps +18%Average of class Subnotebook (16.7 - 50, n=9, last 2 years)
31.4 fps +12%Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPUApple M3, Apple M3 10-Core GPU
28 fps Baldur's Gate 3
1920x1080 High Preset AA:TApple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 ProApple M3 Pro 12-Core, Apple M3 Pro 18-Core GPU
53 fps +152%Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 ProApple M3 Pro 11-Core, Apple M3 Pro 14-Core GPU
42 fps +100%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
26.8 fps +28%Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 Gen 2AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
26.1 fps +24%Average of class Subnotebook (10.3 - 32.9, n=59, last 2 years)
23.3 fps +11%Average Apple M3 10-Core GPU (21 - 22, n=2)
21.5 fps +2%Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPUApple M3, Apple M3 10-Core GPU
21 fps 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:TApple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 ProApple M3 Pro 12-Core, Apple M3 Pro 18-Core GPU
43 fps +126%Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 ProApple M3 Pro 11-Core, Apple M3 Pro 14-Core GPU
39 fps +105%Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 Gen 2AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U, AMD Radeon 780M
25.7 fps +35%Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon G12Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPU
24.4 fps +28%Average of class Subnotebook (10.2 - 32.2, n=58, last 2 years)
22.4 fps +18%Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPUApple M3, Apple M3 10-Core GPU
19 fps Average Apple M3 10-Core GPU (19 - 19, n=2)
19 fps 0%Shadow of the Tomb Raider
1920x1080 High Preset AA:SMApple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 ProApple M2 Pro, Apple M2 Pro 19-Core GPU
72 fps +112%Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro EntryApple M2 Pro 10-Core, Apple M2 Pro 16-Core GPU
65 fps +91%Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 ProApple M3 Pro 12-Core, Apple M3 Pro 18-Core GPU
65 fps +91%Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 ProApple M3 Pro 11-Core, Apple M3 Pro 14-Core GPU
60 fps +76%Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3Apple M3, Apple M3 10-Core GPU
41 fps +21%Average Apple M3 10-Core GPU (34 - 41, n=3)
37.7 fps +11%Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPUApple M3, Apple M3 10-Core GPU
34 fps Average of class Subnotebook (23 - 39, n=5, last 2 years)
33.6 fps -1%Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
25.9 fps -24%Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPUApple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU
25 fps -26%1920x1080 Highest Preset AA:TApple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 ProApple M2 Pro, Apple M2 Pro 19-Core GPU
63 fps +110%Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M2 Pro EntryApple M2 Pro 10-Core, Apple M2 Pro 16-Core GPU
57 fps +90%Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 ProApple M3 Pro 12-Core, Apple M3 Pro 18-Core GPU
57 fps +90%Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 ProApple M3 Pro 11-Core, Apple M3 Pro 14-Core GPU
53 fps +77%Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3Apple M3, Apple M3 10-Core GPU
36 fps +20%Average Apple M3 10-Core GPU (30 - 36, n=3)
32.7 fps +9%Average of class Subnotebook (30 - 34, n=4, last 2 years)
31.5 fps +5%Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPUApple M3, Apple M3 10-Core GPU
30 fps Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs
22.4 fps -25%Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPUApple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPU
21 fps -30%The Witcher 3 | Total War Pharaoh | Baldur's Gate 3 | Shadow of the Tomb Raider
lowmed.highultraThe Witcher 3 (2015)
36
24
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018)
103
38
34
30
Baldur's Gate 3 (2023)
31
26
21
19
Total War Pharaoh (2023)
123
67
43
28
废气排放 - MacBook Air 始终悄无声息噪音排放MacBook Air 13 与速度类似的 Windows 系统同类产品相比，最大的优势仍然是它的被动散热。无论你在设备上做什么（甚至在为两台外接显示器供电时），它始终保持静音，不会发出任何电子噪音。
Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPUM3 10-Core GPU, M3, Apple SSD AP0512ZApple MacBook Air M2 10C GPUM2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024ZAsus ZenBook 14 UX3405MAArc 8-Core, Ultra 7 155H, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFMLenovo ThinkPad Z13 Gen 2Radeon 780M, R7 PRO 7840U, SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164NHP Dragonfly G4Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1365U, Micron 3400 MTFDKBA512TFH 512GBDell XPS 13 Plus 9320 Core i7-1360PIris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360P, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQHuawei MateBook X Pro 2023Iris Xe G7 96EUs, i7-1360PApple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3M3 10-Core GPU, M3, Apple SSD AP1024ZNoiseoff / environment * (dB)23.425.123.323.725.424.2Idle Minimum * (dB)23.425.823.52425.424.2Idle Average * (dB)23.425.823.52425.424.2Idle Maximum * (dB)24.528.326.824.429.624.2Load Average * (dB)39.328.327.2374225.1Witcher 3 ultra * (dB)35.944.832.742.125.1Load Maximum * (dB)39.344.8354240.948.5* ... smaller is better
温度尽管采用了被动散热技术，Apple 仍然能控制机箱温度，在空闲模式下/执行简单任务时，设备几乎不会发热。在一小时的压力测试后，我们注意到在底座顶部和底部的中间区域有一个 44°C 的热点。当然，这很明显，但不会限制笔记本电脑的使用。
Max. LoadIdle
42.3 °C44.3 °C38.9 °C 36.5 °C39.6 °C34.9 °C 32.9 °C29.3 °C31.6 °C
Maximum: 44.3 °CAverage: 36.7 °C
41.2 °C43.4 °C42.4 °C37.9 °C40.7 °C39.9 °C32.8 °C34.4 °C33.6 °C
Maximum: 43.4 °CAverage: 38.5 °C Power Supply (max.) 40.2 °C | Room Temperature 19.7 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900Max. LoadIdle
22.1 °C22.3 °C21.9 °C 21.8 °C21.9 °C21.8 °C 21.6 °C21.5 °C21.6 °C
Maximum: 22.3 °CAverage: 21.8 °C
21.9 °C22.1 °C22.1 °C21.9 °C22 °C22 °C21.9 °C21.8 °C21.8 °C
Maximum: 22.1 °CAverage: 21.9 °C Power Supply (max.) 24.4 °C | Room Temperature 19.6 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated), Voltcraft IR-900(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36.7 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 30.8 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Subnotebook.(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.3 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43.4 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 39.3 °C / 103 F(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 21.8 °C / 71 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (32.9 °C / 91.2 F) and are therefore not hot. (-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.2 °C / 82.8 F (-4.7 °C / -8.4 F).
表面温度应力测试（顶部）
表面温度应力测试（底部）
Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPUApple M3, Apple M3 10-Core GPUApple MacBook Air M2 10C GPUApple M2, Apple M2 10-Core GPUAsus ZenBook 14 UX3405MAIntel Core Ultra 7 155H, Intel Arc 8-Core iGPULenovo ThinkPad Z13 Gen 2AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U, AMD Radeon 780MHP Dragonfly G4Intel Core i7-1365U, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUsDell XPS 13 Plus 9320 Core i7-1360PIntel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUsHuawei MateBook X Pro 2023Intel Core i7-1360P, Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUsHeat-8%-5%-6%-9%-6%-29%Maximum Upper Side * (°C)44.344.7 -1%40.9 8%46.2 -4%38.6 13%43.8 1%46.5 -5%Maximum Bottom * (°C)43.444.6 -3%46.8 -8%48.4 -12%40.4 7%44.4 -2%44.7 -3%Idle Upper Side * (°C)22.325.1 -13%24.1 -8%23.2 -4%28.2 -26%24 -8%34.9 -57%Idle Bottom * (°C)22.125.3 -14%24.6 -11%23 -4%29 -31%25.2 -14%32.9 -49%* ... smaller is better
压力测试在压力测试中，M3 SoC 的功耗曾一度高达 33 瓦，但随后迅速下降。在此 MacBook Pro 14 M3凭借其主动散热器占据了明显的优势，尽管它也无法长时间保持最大值。
在 CPU/GPU 负载情况下，处理器的功耗平衡在 8.5-9 瓦左右，与前代产品相同。不过，在新款 MacBook Air M3 中，GPU 被放在了优先位置。
Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPU M3 10-Core GPU, M3, Apple SSD AP0512Z; Cinebench R23 Multi + 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Stress Test CPU Power: Ø2.45 (1.806-16.677) Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 M3 10-Core GPU, M3, Apple SSD AP1024Z; Cinebench R23 Multi + 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Stress Test CPU Power: Ø14.6 (13.934-20.722) Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024Z; Cinebench R23 Multi + 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Stress Test CPU Power: Ø4.04 (3.269-17.596) Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPU M3 10-Core GPU, M3, Apple SSD AP0512Z; Cinebench R23 Multi + 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Stress Test GPU Power: Ø8.15 (6.38-15.743) Apple MacBook Pro 14 2023 M3 M3 10-Core GPU, M3, Apple SSD AP1024Z; Cinebench R23 Multi + 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Stress Test GPU Power: Ø14.5 (13.915-15.649) Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPU M2 10-Core GPU, M2, Apple SSD AP1024Z; Cinebench R23 Multi + 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Stress Test GPU Power: Ø4.28 (3.27-13.289)
发言人鉴于该设备的底座很薄，配备四个扬声器的音响系统仍能提供非常好的音效，在很多情况下，你甚至不需要外接扬声器。不过，较大型 MacBook Pro 的音响系统更加出色，而 Windows 系统的竞争产品（如 华硕 Zenbook 14或 惠普蜻蜓 G4)也赶上了 MacBook Air，在某些情况下甚至超过了 MacBook Air。
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPU audio analysis(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.2 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.3% lower than median(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.3% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(+) | balanced mids - only 0.4% away from median(+) | mids are linear (1.6% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(+) | balanced highs - only 4.5% away from median(+) | highs are linear (1.9% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(+) | overall sound is linear (10.7% difference to median)Compared to same class» 8% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 89% worse» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 53%Compared to all devices tested» 5% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 93% worse» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MA audio analysis(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.2 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.6% lower than median(±) | linearity of bass is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(+) | balanced mids - only 1.5% away from median(+) | mids are linear (3.1% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median(+) | highs are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(+) | overall sound is linear (7.3% difference to median)Compared to same class» 1% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 98% worse» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 53%Compared to all devices tested» 1% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 99% worse» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
HP Dragonfly G4 audio analysis(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.4 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.4% lower than median(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.6% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(+) | balanced mids - only 2.3% away from median(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(+) | balanced highs - only 3.2% away from median(+) | highs are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(+) | overall sound is linear (9.1% difference to median)Compared to same class» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 95% worse» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 53%Compared to all devices tested» 3% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 97% worse» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
电源管理 - 电池寿命长耗电量在全亮度下空转时，MacBook Air 13 M3 比前代产品略显节俭。 略显节俭。在负载情况下，35 瓦的电源仍然是限制因素。在使用功率更大的 65 瓦电源时，我们测得的短时间峰值功耗为 66 瓦，几分钟后功耗下降，低于 35 瓦。在接下来的过程中，其消耗平衡在 23 瓦左右。在这种情况下使用 35 瓦的电源时，为了满足额外的电力需求，最终需要使用电池。不幸的是，目前几乎所有英特尔子笔记本电脑都存在这个问题。
Power Consumption
Off / Standby 0.17 / 0.31 WattIdle 1.95 / 8.7 / 8.9 Watt
Load
34.3 / 35.4 Watt
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy
Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPUM3, M3 10-Core GPU, Apple SSD AP0512Z, IPS, 2560x1664, 13.6"Apple MacBook Air M2 10C GPUM2, M2 10-Core GPU, Apple SSD AP1024Z, IPS, 2560x1664, 13.6"Asus ZenBook 14 UX3405MAUltra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, Micron 2400 MTFDKBA1T0QFM, OLED, 2880x1800, 14"Lenovo ThinkPad Z13 Gen 2R7 PRO 7840U, Radeon 780M, SK hynix BC901 HFS001TEJ4X164N, OLED, 2880x1800, 13.3"HP Dragonfly G4i7-1365U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Micron 3400 MTFDKBA512TFH 512GB, IPS, 1920x1280, 13.5"Dell XPS 13 Plus 9320 Core i7-1360Pi7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, Samsung PM9A1 MZVL2512HCJQ, OLED, 3456x2160, 13.4"Huawei MateBook X Pro 2023i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, , IPS, 3120x2080, 14.2"Average Apple M3 10-Core GPU Average of class Subnotebook Power Consumption-3%-73%-59%-35%-78%-67%-17%-42%Idle Minimum * (Watt)1.951.9 3%6.1 -213%5.8 -197%4.1 -110%6.9 -254%4.1 -110%2.1 ?(1.95 - 2.2, n=3) -8%4.08 ?(1.3 - 9.3, n=70, last 2 years) -109%Idle Average * (Watt)8.79.6 -10%10 -15%6.2 29%7.5 14%7.4 15%6.6 24%10.6 ?(8.7 - 12, n=3) -22%6.97 ?(2.5 - 16, n=70, last 2 years) 20%Idle Maximum * (Watt)8.99.7 -9%10.3 -16%12.7 -43%8.2 8%13.6 -53%8 10%10.9 ?(8.9 - 12.2, n=3) -22%8.59 ?(4.1 - 16.4, n=70, last 2 years) 3%Load Average * (Watt)34.332.4 6%53.3 -55%27.2 21%35.5 -3%43.5 -27%61 -78%35.5 ?(34.3 - 36.4, n=3) -3%44.7 ?(13.8 - 78.6, n=68, last 2 years) -30%Witcher 3 ultra * (Watt)28.630.8 -8%42 -47%54.1 -89%37.5 -31%48 -68%56 -96%Load Maximum * (Watt)35.435.7 -1%67 -89%61.4 -73%66.5 -88%63.3 -79%90 -154%46.4 ?(35.4 - 66.7, n=3) -31%68.1 ?(30.8 - 121.2, n=70, last 2 years) -92%* ... smaller is better
Power consumption Witcher 3 / stress test
Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPU; Witcher 3 ultra: Ø28.6 (28.1-29.3) Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPU; 1280x720 Prime95 28.10 and Furmark 1.25: Ø31 (26-35.4) Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPU; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø3.94 (3.86-4.17)
Power consumption with external monitor
Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPU; Cinebench R23 Single (external Monitor): Ø10.9 (10.3-13.2) Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPU; Cinebench R23 Multi (external Monitor): Ø24.7 (21.7-32.9) Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPU; 1920x1080 The Witcher 3 ultra (external Monitor): Ø23.2 (22.5-24.2) Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPU; Idle 1min (external Monitor): Ø2.87 (2.79-3.1)
运行时间其 56.2 Wh 的电池容量保持不变，我们在电池测试中也看到了类似的结果。在 WLAN 测试中，亮度调整为 150 cd/m²（比最大亮度降低了 7 级大亮度和 2 级小亮度），我们测得的时间略高于 15 小时，这意味着它比前一代 M2 多用了半小时。惠普 惠普蜻蜓 G4的电池容量更大，续航时间也长了 40 分钟，而所有其他 Windows 竞争对手都落在后面。在全屏亮度下，WLAN 测试仅持续了约 7 个小时，比旧款机型多 1 个小时（这也与较低的闲置耗电量相吻合）。我们将尽快提供其他电池测试的结果。
MacBook Air 的电池充电速度仍然不是特别快，使用 35 瓦的电源，在开机状态下充电需要约 2.5 小时。在我们对 MacBook Air M2 的
评测中，我们增加了使用不同电源对其充电时间的测试结果。
Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing (Safari 17.4)
15h 14min
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness (Safari 17.4)
6h 48min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
17h 24min
Load (maximum brightness)
2h 51min
Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPUM3, M3 10-Core GPU, 52.6 WhApple MacBook Air M2 10C GPUM2, M2 10-Core GPU, 52.6 WhAsus ZenBook 14 UX3405MAUltra 7 155H, Arc 8-Core, 75 WhLenovo ThinkPad Z13 Gen 2R7 PRO 7840U, Radeon 780M, 51.5 WhHP Dragonfly G4i7-1365U, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 68 WhDell XPS 13 Plus 9320 Core i7-1360Pi7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 55 WhHuawei MateBook X Pro 2023i7-1360P, Iris Xe G7 96EUs, 60 WhAverage of class Subnotebook Battery runtime-6%-16%-49%8%-52%-38%-16%H.264 (h)17.415.8 -9%16.8 -3%8.8 -49%16.7 ?(9.07 - 23.8, n=29, last 2 years) -4%WiFi v1.3 (h)15.214.7 -3%11.8 -22%7.8 -49%15.9 5%7.3 -52%9.7 -36%13.3 ?(7.25 - 26.4, n=71, last 2 years) -12%Load (h)2.92.2 -24%3.2 10%2.1 -28%1.935 ?(0.8 - 3.8, n=42, last 2 years) -33%
Pros+ 高质量的超薄外壳
+ 良好的输入设备
+ 使用时始终保持静音
+ 明亮的 p3 显示屏，无 pwm
+ 出色的扬声器
+ 150 尼特的长时间运行
+ 出色的系统性能
+ 无线局域网速度比以前更快Cons- 既不支持 Thunderbolt 4，也不支持 Wi-Fi 7
- 只有 2x USB-C 接口，没有读卡器
- 电源太弱（35 瓦）
- 没有维护选项，升级费用昂贵
结论：配备 M3 SoC 的 MacBook Air 13 更胜一筹Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 评测。测试设备由 德国提供。Apple 之后 MacBook Pro 14在去年年底发布了配备全新 M3 SoC 的 MacBook Pro 14 之后，我们已经知道了 MacBook Air M3 的预期。由于新的 3 纳米芯片的功耗与 M2 SoC 基本相同，因此 MacBook Air 也能充分发挥新 M3 的潜力，比 M2 领先 20%。
虽然被动散热会导致笔记本电脑在长期负载时性能略有下降（约 20%），但这是当前英特尔机型的常态（至少在多核性能方面），即使采用主动散热也是如此。另一方面，其出色的单核性能保持不变，在这方面，Apple ，能够将竞争对手--AMD Ryzen-8000 处理器和英特尔流星湖芯片--甩在身后。而这一切都发生在一个被动冷却的设备中。目前，还没有同类的 Windows 替代产品能提供如此强劲的性能，同时又没有恼人的风扇噪音。
即使在其他方面，MacBook Air M3 也没有出现任何重大失误。由于配备了 Wi-Fi 6E（160 MHz），Apple ，MacBook Air M3 在 WLAN 性能方面迎头赶上。虽然缺少 Thunderbolt 4 在日常使用中应该比左侧仅限于 2x USB-C 的问题要小一些，但它的连接情况可能是该设备的主要缺陷。一如既往，它的运行时间令人震惊，即使 Windows 竞争对手正在慢慢追赶Apple 。带有两个 USB-C 端口的 35 瓦电源可能比较实用，但如果你想充分发挥 M3 的潜力，它的功率实际上略显不足。它的性能不会受到影响，但不足的部分确实要由笔记本电脑的电池吸收几分钟。现在，新的午夜色机身上多了一层涂层，使其不再像以前那样容易沾染指纹。
更好的性能和更快的无线局域网：有了新的 M3 SoC，Apple ，MacBook Air 13 变得更加出色，没有任何 Windows 替代产品能提供更好的整体解决方案。静音运行尤其是 MacBook Air 的一大优势。
该设备的 13.6 英寸 IPS 面板继续提供色彩准确、亮度水平良好的画质，但我们希望能慢慢看到它升级到 120 Hz。不过，与 Mini-LED 和 OLED 面板相比，它的优势在于无需使用 PWM。如果关上显示屏盖子，新款 Air M3 现在还能容纳两台外接显示器。当然，这并不理想，但对于希望在办公桌上使用两台显示器的用户来说，这可能很有用。它最大的问题仍然是价格，1099 美元的售价仍然只有 8GB 内存和 256GB 固态硬盘。但似乎仍有足够的买家，至少对于普通用户来说，这样的配置肯定还是足够的。
Download your licensed rating image as SVG / PNG
价格和供应情况目前，新款 MacBook Air 13 M3 可以在许多在线零售商处购买。例如，在亚马逊上，基本型号的售价为1,099 美元。
Apple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPU
- 03/07/2024 v7 (old)
Andreas Osthoff
Chassis88 / 98 → 90%
Keyboard92%
Pointing Device100%
Connectivity62 / 75 → 83%
Weight72 / 20-75 → 95%
Battery91%
Display91%
Games Performance71 / 78 → 90%
Application Performance96 / 85 → 100%
Temperature91%
Noise100%
Audio89 / 91 → 98%
Camera41 / 85 → 48%
Average83%
92%
Subnotebook - Weighted Average
More articles related to this deviceApple MacBook Air 13 M3 10C GPU (MacBook Air 13 M3 Series)News•外置散热器帮助配备Apple M3 的 MacBook Ai...
TransparencyThe selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
Price comparison
此外，我们还提供了与尺寸更大的 MacBook Air 15 M3的对比照片，让您对尺寸有更直观的印象。
Editor of the original article: Daisy Dickson - Translator - 463 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2023Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 666018 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008contact me via:
Please share our article, every link counts!